At this point -- 2018 -- Spring-And-Loop Theory is quite comfortable
with itself. Happy to have come up with a better model, and with
having shared it with the world, Spring-And-Loop Theory is at peace.
But the world -- of physics and otherwise -- is at war.
What to do?
A fundamental premise behind Just-Think-It.com is that this world
could be completely different -- if we changed our thinking.
But people don't want to do this.
And other people -- greedy and addicted to control -- take
advantage of this.
So how does one convince people to change, despite the raging
torrent of encouragement to not change?
Let's face it.
You reacted...up there...when I said "convince".
We don't want to be convinced. We react, strongely, against
anything that tries to convince us.
Yet we love pretzels.
I mean, they are just so...bite-sized.
So we pretzel our way through life.
Assuming we are 100% healthy.
And assuming every person we know is 100% healthy.
And assuming we have all the money we could ever want.
And assuming every person we know is loaded as well.
And assuming we know everything.
And...I think you get the idea.
If we are ignorant, only learning something will change that
in us.
I believe I have convinced you that you need to be convinced.
At least once in a while, and usually about something
that doesn't matter.
Er, sorry about that, my skepticism got the better of me.
You can either have someone convince you of something -- at least
once in a while -- or you can be ignorant.
Which sucks, but has the advantage that we usually don't know
that it -- i.e. we -- suck(s).
Guarded, no doubt, but open.
Perfect. My plan is working.
While we are amateurs at avoiding it.
Precisely because we are told that we are good at it.
By the same people (same group, anyway) doing it.
Flattery will get you killed quicker than anything
- Spring-And-Loop Theory
I'm not too picky about which one gets renamed, although
I'd suggest it be aluminum, so that the Brits have one
less obsolete word to stand on.
You see, you're going to give me my own element because I'm
going to convince you. Of something.
Like Barry, or at least his handlers, did.
Or I might trumpet my new cure for baldness or liver spots.
Tell you what, I'll let you decide.
Just be sure I get one million dollars* along with it.
Otherwise no one will be convinced.
But only if they speak indirectly.
We all want to be as rich as Rockenfelder (a much more financially
lucrative spelling than the one we little people are used to seeing).
But we don't want to be like that "capitalist swine"
Yet we really do want to be like a Rothschild (there's a
maximally successful spelling again...coincidence I tell, mere
coincidence).
Because we don't know what we want.
Why?
We live in know-it-all times. Why, going into space is so easy,
even a car can do it.
Why do we even need the word why any more?
If lying was a pat on the back, we would all be black and blue.
By breakfast.
That's progress.
Not out of the woods yet, but we're heading the right way.
What do the liars do?
I mean, the answer is right above this line, yet we rarely
(collectively) get it.
A lie from ten thousand Evelyn Experts is less rarely seen,
and thus it wins the day.
We, the 99%, are in a numbers battle with a foe 99 times smaller
than us. And we're losing.
Doing the seemingly impossible, without breaking a sweat.
I'm sure Sir Joseph would be so proud of what
the club spawned.
The Nobel prize for physics...is hush** money.
Not necessarily directly.
I'm not saying that each and every physics Nobel winner
has been bought off.
Although that is a possibility.
That I'm not implying.
If you want to impress someone with your humbleness,
a quiet approach is good.
If you want North Korea to believe you might vaporize
them, bring an aircraft carrier.
It would still be a lie, but size matters.
Anyway, part of the way through we hear the phrase "long con".
It bears pointing out because we rarely hear that phrase.
Even in that movie. Yet it was a key part of the plot of
that movie.
Why?
We might think the reason is that there are relatively few
long cons.
And that would be very cuddly cute of us to think that.
Adorable even.
We might also consider that we don't hear the phrase because
once heard it is hard to unhear. A counter-seed has been
planted and one day we might finally wake up to a bunch of
stuff.
Which would be bad for the big boys. Who employ long cons
more than all the rest of us combined.
By definition it is the longest of long cons.
And thus the biggest game in town. If you like torture.
Which of course the 1% do.
Ok, so you hate religion, and are "not religious".
I'll believe you.
Not really, but to further a different con I'll say I do.
Mutually exclusive things. Like "rational" and "Democrat".
So faith...belief...religion is what we are born into.
In every subject we ever think about.
We start off clueless -- naked as a Jaybird -- and, if
we're very lucky, we learn a few things.
But that was not always the case, was it?
There was a time when we respected our elders.
Why did we stop?
Elders are intelligent until it appears otherwise.
Hipsters are morons...well, that's about it.
Let's count them.
(1) religion
Any others?
(2) war -- we took a pot shot at it right off the top
(3) resistance to change -- "the raging torrent of encouragement to not change"
(4) encouragement to change -- you see, we are actually
constantly encouraged to change. Provided it
involves something useless (i.e. "new" or "cool" or "stupid").
Two things come from this -- we waste our time/money/energy
AND we build up a resistance to change. See (3) above.
(5) skepticism -- we are told we are good at being skeptical,
or that being skeptical is a virtue, when it is actually
critical thinking that is the value. Skepticism is close
minded (like most physicists) where a critical thinker is
someone like Christopher Hitchens.
(6) ignorance is good -- whether it is our continually
deteriorating school system, or that "popcorn flick" we
should watch (because every single one of our friends has),
or the absurd little viral video ya simply gotta watch.
(7) we are brilliant -- another contradictory one, this
is what the 1% have to do to shore up both fences the
cows must follow to the slaughterhouse. By the way,
truth doesn't need shoring. Freedom does, hence the
4th of July boom booms, and ongoing controversies over anthems.
(8) prizes -- ok, we're in the middle of talking about
this one, but it is in fact the elephant con on this web page,
er, room.
(9) deciding -- recall "Tell you what, I'll let you decide"?
We think we have choice just like we think we change.
Changing from one unhealthy -- chips -- to another unhealthy
thing -- "no trans fats chips" is not change. It is a cow
moving from one clump of grass to the next clump of grass.
Does a cow strike you as a creature of change?
(10) that money is everything -- one of the keys to the Nobel
con, this long con is so well established, we call it a dream.
How we are going to "make it". Our Holy Grail. Nirvana.
Nevermind.
(11) that money even is -- fiat currency = not 'money'.
It is a vague promise, made from the back of a moving
train, by a politician, who is smiling.
(12) that names/spellings don't matter -- that Rockenfelder
equals Rockefeller equals Jason. We even have a quote from
some famous medieval duded about names and roses.
(13) the Shakes-a-spear con -- see (12) above
(14) that money is bad -- "capitalist swine" must be pushed
as hard as money rocks, just like the other con pairs.
Things get very complicated when you turn down Liar's Road.
(15) we know what we want -- an extension of the money is
everything con, this long con is needed to hide the fact
that "we don't know what we want". We can't know what we
want because our entire culture is set up on us pursuing
the wrong things. If you want people to fail, teach them
falsehoods. Long con them from diapers on up.
(16) trivialize everything -- turning us away from old wise
people, this has the additional benefit of
(17) make random useless trivial facts into gods -- see
"Did you know that 'Why?' is the most common question in the
universe?" above. I did exactly zero research on that, but
presented it as if I was as confident in it as a dentist is
with his fluoridated dental products. On purpose. Because
I was pretending I didn't care. To make this contrary point
later on.
(18) depersonalizing the nastiest bits -- when someone steals
billions from us wage-slaved 99 percenters, we are told it
was a "breach", a gap in security, when in fact it was -- quite
invariably -- an inside job by the highest level douchebags.
(19) justice is impossible -- when you loudly announce to the
world that Harvey Weinstein has been arrested, and charged,
few bother to consider why he
is actually out on bail right now (May, 2018). Most just
blindly hope he will be back in court to face a judge and/or
jury and get a punishment and and and...When there are more
ways for him to avoid jail than grains of sand on all the
beaches of the world. In China, really bad people are shot
on sight.
(20) none dare call it -- conspiracy talk is hushed up more
effectively than almost any other subject. By calling people
bad names. Yes, that is all it takes because they know we
are all vain and weak. And names always hurt us.
(21) experts -- four out of five doctors smoke cancer sticks
...because they care about us.
(22) the threat con -- we are especially afraid of saying
something bad about someone. In part because it is a head-
chopping offense (in some countries). But really because we
are told that we should be afraid. Even in America where some
opinions are still allowed some of the time. I hope.
(23) the disbelief con -- "it can't be", "they can't be",
"do you realize how many would have to be working together?"
Yes I do. About 70 million of them. Fun fact, they have
half of all wealth, with the other half of "wealth" being
in the hands of us little people. Do you feel wealthy?
Me neither. I consider what I have to be the bare minimum
I need to function. So this a war of tactical nukers vs
people barely able to reach for a rock. Sound
familiar?***
(24) quicksand foundations -- twelve plus years of world
class brainwashing leave us exhausted, I mean convinced,
that every subject has been carefully and properly taught
to us. What a perfect backdrop to a world built -- 100%
-- on lies. This is long con genius, folks. Step right up.
(25) they are good people -- face it, we all think the most
powerful people are good...provided they share the same
political belief system. Doctors pushing toxic vaccines
"mean well". Drug companies are...ok, this one doesn't
apply to all long cons.
(26) as long as they take me seriously -- this massive
long con is best seen by its lack...in Donald Trump.
He doesn't take you seriously unless you deserve it.
And there are untold millions of us that don't deserve it.
Etc.****
Like pretty much everything else in a theory as good as
Spring-And-Loop Theory, the amino acids of Floydium can be stated
with just a few words.
And did ze
tell you the name of the game, purple penguins?
They call it riding the gravy train.
Once a long con is started, it must***** be driven to the end.
Since 99 percenters are disposable, the logical fini of our age
is eugenics-crafted.
But along the way? Money, money, money!!!******
* - This is the 2012 and onward figure, down from the
1,400,000 USD given out in 2009. Better hurry because
the trend does not look good for me.
c
** - Try this little test. Here is
a link
to Deep Purple's 'Hush'. Go there (lower the volume first
if you do not think you will like this song), listen to the
song (reading the lyrics if you wish), then return to this
page and scroll to the bottom of it where you will find a
question. Make your best guess what the answer is, then
click the link provided.
BOTTOM QUESTION: What is the most common word in the song?
ANSWR: hush - 16, na - 90 (if this is a word). But even if
na is not a word, love appears twice more than hush - 18.
*** - Why is there an emdash, instead of a regular hyphen,
in that link? Those are one or more cons for another day.
**** - For a massive conspiracy not talked about here,
check out Randall Carlson, on the Joe Rogan Experience
(#501) as he obliterates the man-made global warming scam.
***** - The 1% are bat[doodoo] crazy. Incapable of change.
Unreasonable regardless of facts (see Hillary's non-consequence
for having a private email server containing countless
Top Secret documents). They simple never give-in. Never
admit their mistakes. Never regret. Never care.
****** - There are a depressing number of songs with the phrase
"money, money, money" in them.
The Speed Of Light
Black Holes
Einstein's Equation
The Ether
Gravity
The font color used for the word "money" was
found here
Floydium
WARNING
With this series of talks, Spring-And-Loop Theory takes a new tack...
And?...
Not that there is anything wrong with that, of course.
Convinced?
Should we be not quite as wealthy as we would like to be,
we need to change something or we will continue in an unhealthy
direction.
An early summing up
I got confused even in the writing of the above, so let's summarize.
Ok, I'm convinced
So, now you are open.
Then this happens...
The problem is that those who control us are masters of it.
Which brings us to Floydium
That's what I'd like my element to be called.
Coo, coo. Coo, coo.
I could try to convince you that I'm a peaceful dude.
Bullion backs [baloney]
In a world controlled by the almighty
fiat currency,
only those with a lot of yellow metal bars are listened to.
[Ouch, somewhere a pig just winced.]
Why?
Did you know that "Why?" is the most common question in the
universe?
Liars, darn liars...and the 1%
We are lied to on a truly fantastic level these days.
How do they do it?
I see you've moved from "Why?" to "How?".
Do what?
You see, this is the key to the whole scam.
Nothing without everyone
A lie from one Joe Average is quickly seen.
Shazaam!
That meets my definition of magic.
Money hawks...
And so we end up back at the beginning, only changed a bit. Hopefully.
Bigger really is better
When it comes to lies, not even the sky is the limit.
More detail
"The Grifters" is a great movie. Maybe John's or Angela's
best.
Examples
Religion is a long con.
Either or
We either know stuff, or we believe stuff.
Over the hill
Only to find out that no one cares what we have learned.
Pop quiz
How many long cons have we talked about so far on this page?
Our feature attraction
Now that I've driven off 99% of those who loaded this page,
let's get to the tofu of the subject.
When you have all the money, you can make a metric ton
more of it by bribing a few people.
Or, in physics-speak, nothing wins Nobel prizes like broken theories.
The more things change...
The 1% make sure that nothing of importance changes in western life.
In conclusion
If you want a simple, consistent, unified theory of physics,
you will need to stop lunging for the Nobel teat.
Footnotes:
Use the Periodic Table symbols for Chapter Headings
and throughout the document...
Physicists today are as arrogant as they are LOST
- chasing a Nobel is NOT science
- - - - -
>>> _Floydium & _Misc >>>
Member of the Nobel committee for physics explains
topology using a cinnamon bun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLmXqz9QaJU
- 60 seconds of torture
- - - - -
Oct 4, 2017
"The Absurdity of the Nobel Prizes in Science
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/10/the-absurdity-of-the-nobel-prizes-in-science/541863/
- - - - -
The chemical elements of the periodic chart
https://www.lenntech.com/periodic/name/alphabetic.htm
Sorted by:
- Name alphabetically
- Atomic number
- Symbol
- Atomic Mass
- Electronegativity
- Density
- Melting point
- Boiling point
- Vanderwaals radius
- Year of discovery
- Inventor surname
- Elements in earthcrust
- Elements in human body
- Covalent Radius
- Ionization energy
For chemistry students and teachers: The tabular chart on the
right is alphabetically listed.
The first chemical element is Actinium and the last is Zirconium.
Please note that the elements do not show their natural relation
towards each other as in the Periodic system. There you can find
the metals, semi-conductor(s), non-metal(s), inert noble gas(ses),
Halogens, Lanthanoides, Actinoids (rare earth elements) and
transition metals.
Actinium Ac 89
Aluminum Al 13
Americium Am 95
Antimony Sb 51
Argon Ar 18
Arsenic As 33
Astatine At 85
Barium Ba 56
Berkelium Bk 97
Beryllium Be 4
Bismuth Bi 83
Bohrium Bh 107
Boron B 5
Bromine Br 35
Cadmium Cd 48
Calcium Ca 20
Californium Cf 98
Carbon C 6
Cerium Ce 58
Cesium Cs 55
Chlorine Cl 17
Chromium Cr 24
Cobalt Co 27
Copernicium Cn 112
Copper Cu 29
Curium Cm 96
Darmstadtium Ds 110
Dubnium Db 105
Dysprosium Dy 66
Einsteinium Es 99
Erbium Er 68
Europium Eu 63
Fermium Fm 100
Flerovium Fl 114
Fluorine F 9
Francium Fr 87
Gadolinium Gd 64
Gallium Ga 31
Germanium Ge 32
Gold Au 79
Hafnium Hf 72
Hassium Hs 108
Helium He 2
Holmium Ho 67
Hydrogen H 1
Indium In 49
Iodine I 53
Iridium Ir 77
Iron Fe 26
Krypton Kr 36
Lanthanum La 57
Lawrencium Lr 103
Lead Pb 82
Lithium Li 3
Livermorium Lv 116
Lutetium Lu 71
Magnesium Mg 12
Manganese Mn 25
Meitnerium Mt 109
Mendelevium Md 101
Mercury Hg 80
Molybdenum Mo 42
Moscovium Mc 115
Neodymium Nd 60
Neon Ne 10
Neptunium Np 93
Nickel Ni 28
Nihonium Nh 113
Niobium Nb 41
Nitrogen N 7
Nobelium No 102
Oganesson Og 118
Osmium Os 76
Oxygen O 8
Palladium Pd 46
Phosphorus P 15
Platinum Pt 78
Plutonium Pu 94
Polonium Po 84
Potassium K 19
Praseodymium Pr 59
Promethium Pm 61
Protactinium Pa 91
Radium Ra 88
Radon Rn 86
Rhenium Re 75
Rhodium Rh 45
Roentgenium Rg 111
Rubidium Rb 37
Ruthenium Ru 44
Rutherfordium Rf 104
Samarium Sm 62
Scandium Sc 21
Seaborgium Sg 106
Selenium Se 34
Silicon Si 14
Silver Ag 47
Sodium Na 11
Strontium Sr 38
Sulfur S 16
Tantalum Ta 73
Technetium Tc 43
Tellurium Te 52
Tennessine Ts 117
Terbium Tb 65
Thallium Tl 81
Thorium Th 90
Thulium Tm 69
Tin Sn 50
Titanium Ti 22
Tungsten W 74
Uranium U 92
Vanadium V 23
Xenon Xe 54
Ytterbium Yb 70
Yttrium Y 39
Zinc Zn 30
Zirconium Zr 40
COASALT
Introduction
222 Answers
The Atom
Quantum World
Neutrino
Black Holes Revisited
The Comedy Of Science
et=mc3
Comparing Physics Theories
Diffuse Interstellar Bands
Einstein's Ether Talk
No Strong Force
The Electron
Relativity
Unification
Assumptions
Modeling
The Greatest Story
My Theory
Physics Quotes & Thoughts
Dogma
The Control System
Math Sucks
tEmP Theories/Theorists
Spring-And-Loop Theory by Floyd Maxwell is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Click here (then click Join Group) to subscribe