
150+ Fluoride facts, horror stories
and cover-ups
by Floyd Maxwell, BASc
Principal, http://www.just-think-it.com
Table of Contents
By Site
From other sites (8)
Fluoride in any form -- drops, tablets, or vitamins -- has
never been approved by the Food and Drug Administration
(as required by law since 1938).
http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/PDHA/fluoride/unappfda.htm
According to Dr Dean Burke, former chief biochemist at the
National Cancer Institute, more that 50 000 Americans a year
are dying of cancer caused by fluoridated drinking water.
The lethal dose of NaF (an artificial fluoride) is 50 times
smaller than that of CaF2 (a naturally-occurring fluoride).
- Dr. Hardy Limeback, biochemist and Professor of Dentistry,
University of Toronto, former consultant to the Canadian
Dental Association
In 1998 Guan et al. gave similar doses of fluoride as used
by the Mullenix group and found that several key chemicals
in the brain -- those that form the membrane of brain cells,
were substantially depleted in rats given fluoride, as
compared to those who did not receive fluoride.
30% of industrial waste from semiconductor plants is
fluorine-containing waste.
"There were statutory limits on the amounts of certain potentially harmful ingredients, such as arsenic, fluorine, lead and mercury, which could be included in animal feed."
(source)
Water fluoridation is the ideal solution for industry's
fluoride waste disposal problem. Like the tall smoke stack
introduced a decade earlier, it diverts and disperses
pollutants far and wide. Chemicals that would cost $7,000
per tanker to dispose of are sold instead to cities at $265
to at least $722 per ton. Consequently, the phosphate
fertilizer manufacturers invest millions of dollars in grants
and lobbying of government officials to promote water fluoridation.
- "Fluoridation: License to Dump Toxic Waste
In The Name of Public Health",
Health Action Network, Fluoride Report No. 4, Jan (1997)
Contaminated with arsenic, lead, barium, cadmium, and mercury,
no analyses of fluorosilicic acid are performed at the source,
and only rudimentary analyses are performed at water treatment
plants prior to their injection into public water systems. In
many artificially fluoridated areas, the lead and copper content
of the water exceeds EPA/Safe Drinking Water Act standards.
This occurs because of the caustic nature of fluorosilicic
acid and its capacity to leach copper and lead from soldered
pipe joints and brass fixtures.
- "Fluoridation: License to Dump Toxic Waste
In The Name of Public Health",
Health Action Network, Fluoride Report No. 4, Jan (1997)
Children under three should never use fluoridated toothpaste.
Or drink fluoridated water. And baby formula must never be
made up using Toronto tap water. Never. In fluoridated
areas, people should never use fluoride supplements. We
tried to get them banned for children but (the dentists)
wouldn't even look at the evidence we presented.
Fluoride is a carcinogen by any standard we use.
Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, probably because
of their capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by
changing the permeability of the cell membrane and by
inhibiting certain enzyme systems.
As a toxicologist involved in fluoride research for over ten
years, I was stunned by the Calgary Regional Health Authority's
glib comments proclaiming water fluoridation safe. The 'fifty
years' of studies about fluoride safety, do not exist. The
"ongoing intensive research on fluorides and fluoridation',
does not exist, certainly none investigating safety.
The federal maximum contaminant level (MEL) for lead is
15 parts per billion (ppb), 5 ppb for arsenic but 4,000 ppb
for fluoride.
If you have cereal with milk and a Coke, you have overdosed
on fluoride. You have exceeded the American Dental
Association's recommended daily dose by 230%.
Fluoride advocates don't want you to know that the chemicals
used for fluoridation are not pharmaceutical quality. They
are derived from the waste byproducts of fertilizer
manufacturing and contain heavy metals such as lead and
arsenic. Chemifloc Ltd., a fluoridation chemical manufacturer,
clearly states this in a letter reprinted here:
NSF, the corporation that developed drinking water standards,
stated that the "most common contaminant in [fluoridated
water] is arsenic"
The City of Auburndale Florida was so concerned about the
health of workers handling fluoridation chemicals that they
stopped their fluoridation efforts.
Fluoride is a very potent poison. It's a registered
pesticide, used for killing rats or mice.
In British Columbia, only 11% of the population drinks
fluoridated water, as opposed to 40-70% in other Canadian
regions. Yet British Columbia has the lowest rate of tooth
decay in Canada. In addition, the lowest rates of dental
caries within the province are found in areas that do not
have their water supplies fluoridated.
In 1986-87, the largest study on fluoridation and tooth decay
ever was performed. The subjects were 39,000 school children
between 5 and 17 living in 84 areas around the country. A
third of the places were fluoridated, a third were partially
fluoridated, and a third were not. Results indicate no
statistically significant differences in dental decay between
fluoridated and unfluoridated cities.
According to a Sierra Club study, people in unfluoridated
developing nations have fewer dental caries than those
living in industrialized nations.
A World Health Organization survey reports a decline of dental
decay in Western Europe, which is 98% unfluoridated. They
state that western Europe's declining dental decay rates are
equal to and sometimes better than those in the U.S.
A 1992 University of Arizona study yielded surprising results
when they found that "the more fluoride a child drinks, the
more cavities appear in the teeth."
Research does not support the effectiveness of fluoridation
for preventing tooth disease. Also, purported benefits are
supposedly for children, not adults and senior citizens. At
about age 13, any advantage fluoridation might offer comes
to an end, and less than 1% of the fluoridated water supply
reaches this population. Finally, fluoridation has never
been proven safe. On the contrary, several studies directly
link fluoridation to skeletal fluorosis, dental fluorosis,
and several rare forms of cancer. This alone should frighten
us away from its use.
May 1993 - Kodiak, Alaska (Old Harbor): The population was
warned not to consume water due to high fluoride levels.
They were also cautioned against boiling the water, since
this concentrates the substance and worsens the danger.
Although equipment appeared to be functioning normally,
22-24 ppm of fluoride was found in a sample.
[Floyd: i.e. 22 to 24 times more than was supposed to be]
"As is normal, the solution to pollution is dilution.
You poison everyone a little bit rather than poison
a few people a lot. This way, people don't know
what's going on."
Fluoride could only be legally disposed of at a great cost
to industry. As Dr. Bill Marcus explains, "There are
prescribed methods for disposal and they're very expensive.
Fluoride is a very potent poison. It's a registered pesticide,
used for killing rats or mice. If it were to be disposed of,
it would require a class-one landfill. That would cost the
people who are producing aluminum or fertilizer about $7000+
per 5000- to 6000-gallon truckload to dispose of it. It's
highly corrosive."
A spill in Annapolis, Maryland, placed thousands at risk,
but official reports reduced the number to eight. Perhaps
officials are afraid they will invite more lawsuits like
the one for $480 million by the wife of a dialysis patient
who became brain-injured as the result of fluoride poisoning.
Not all fluoride poisoning is accidental. For decades,
industry has knowingly released massive quantities of
fluoride into the air and water. Disenfranchised communities,
with people least able to fight back, are often the victims.
Medical writer Joel Griffiths relays this description of what
industrial pollution can do, in this case to a devastatingly
poisoned Indian reservation: "Cows crawled around the pasture
on their bellies, inching along like giant snails. So
crippled by bone disease they could not stand up, this was
the only way they could graze. Some died kneeling, after
giving birth to stunted calves. Others kept on crawling
until, no longer able to chew because their teeth had
crumbled down to the nerves, they began to starve..." They
were the cattle of the Mohawk Indians on the New York-Canadian
St. Regis Reservation during the period 1960-1975, when
industrial pollution devastated the herd - and along with
it, the Mohawks' way of life. Mohawk children, too, have
shown signs of damage to bones and teeth." Mohawks filed
suit against the Reynolds Metals Company and the Aluminum
Company of America (Alcoa) in 1960, but ended up settling
out of court, where they received $650,000 for their cows.
Fluoride is one of industry's major pollutants, and no one
remains immune to its effects. In 1989, 155,000 tons were
being released annually into the air; and 500,000 tons a
year were disposed of in our lakes, rivers, and oceans.
In 1977, Dr. John Yiamouyiannis and Dr. Dean Burk, former
chief chemist at the National Cancer Institute, released
a study that linked fluoridation to 10,000 cancer deaths
per year in the U.S. Their inquiry, which compared cancer
deaths in the ten largest fluoridated American cities to
those in the ten largest unfluoridated cities between 1940
and 1950, discovered a 5% greater rate in the fluoridated
areas.
According to a National Toxicology Report, due in 1980
but not released until 1990, out of 130 male rats that
ingested 45 to 79 ppm of fluoride, 5 developed osteosarcoma,
a rare bone cancer. There were cases, in both males and
females at those doses, of squamous cell carcinoma in the
mouth. Both rats and mice had dose-related fluorosis of
the teeth, and female rats suffered osteosclerosis of the
long bones. Footnote: in 1986 the EPA *increased* the
dosage of Fluoride from 2.4ppm to 4ppm.
"It is difficult to see how EPA can fail to regulate fluoride
as a carcinogen in light of what NTP has found. Osteosarcomas
are an extremely unusual result in rat carcinogenicity tests.
Toxicologists tell me that the only other substance that has
produced this is radium. The fact that this is a highly
atypical form of cancer implicates fluoride as the cause.
Also, the osteosarcomas appeared to be dose-related, and did
not occur in controls, making it a clean study."
Public health officials such as Dr. Gray in British Columbia
and Dr. Colquhoun in New Zealand found no benefit from
fluoridation. When they reported these results, they
immediately lost their careers.
As Ralph Nader once said, if they admit they're wrong on
fluoridation, people would ask, and legitimately so, what
else have they not told us right?
Most of western Europe has rejected fluoridation on the
grounds that it is unsafe. In 1971, after 11 years of
testing, Sweden's Nobel Medical Institute recommended
against fluoridation, and the process was banned. The
Netherlands outlawed the practice in 1976, after 23 years
of tests. France decided against it after consulting with
its Pasteur Institute and West Germany, now Germany,
rejected the practice because the recommended dosage of
1 ppm was "too close to the dose at which long-term damage
to the human body is to be expected." Dr. Lee sums it up:
"All of western Europe, except one or two test towns in
Spain, has abandoned fluoride as a public health plan.
It is not put in the water anywhere. They all established
test cities and found that the benefits did not occur and
the toxicity was evident."
There is also a moral issue in the debate that has largely
escaped notice. According to columnist James Kilpatrick,
it is "the right of each person to control the drugs he or
she takes." Kilpatrick calls fluoridation compulsory mass
medication, a procedure that violates the principles of
medical ethics.
Only a small margin separates supposedly beneficial fluoride
levels from amounts that are known to cause adverse effects.
Dr. James Patrick, a former antibiotics research scientist
at the National Institutes of Health, describes the predicament:
"[There is] a very low margin of safety involved in fluoridating
water. A concentration of about 1 ppm is recommended...in
several countries, severe fluorosis has been documented from
water supplies containing only 2 or 3 ppm. In the development
of drugs...we generally insist on a therapeutic index (margin
of safety) of the order of 100; a therapeutic index of 2 or 3
is totally unacceptable, yet that is what has been proposed
for public water supplies..."
July 1993 - Chicago, Illinois: Three dialysis patients died
and five experienced toxic reactions to the fluoridated
water used in the treatment process. The CDC was asked
to investigate, but to date there have been no press releases.
The Journal of the Canadian Dental Association states that
"Fluoride supplements should not be recommended for children
less than 3 years old." Since these supplements contain the
same amount of fluoride as water does, they are basically
saying that children under the age of three shouldn't be
drinking fluoridated water at all, under any circumstances.
December 1991 - Benton Harbor Michigan: A faulty pump
allowed approximately 900 gallons of hydrofluosilicic
acid to leak into a chemical storage building at the
water plant. City engineer Roland Klockow stated, "The
concentrated hydrofluosilicic acid was so corrosive that
it ate through more than two inches of concrete in the
storage building.
July 1991 - Porgate, Michigan: After a fluoride injector
pump failed, fluoride levels reached 92 ppm and resulted
in approximately 40 children developing abdominal pains,
sickness, vomiting, and diarrhea at a school arts and
crafts show.
November 1979 - Annapolis, Maryland: One patient died and
eight became ill after renal dialysis treatment. Symptoms
included cardiac arrest (resuscitated), hypotension, chest
pain, difficulty breathing, and a whole gamut of intestinal
problems. Patients not on dialysis also reported nausea,
headaches, cramps, diarrhea, and dizziness. The fluoride
level was later found to be 35 ppm; the problem was traced
to a valve at a water plant that had been left open all night.
Another concern is that fluoride is not found only in drinking
water; it is everywhere. Fluoride is found in foods that are
processed with it, which, in the United States, include nearly
all bottled drinks and canned foods.34 Researchers writing in
The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry have found that
fruit juices, in particular, contain significant amounts of
fluoride. In a recent study, a variety of popular juices and
juice blends were analyzed and it was discovered that 42% of
the samples examined had more than l ppm of fluoride, with
some brands of grape juice containing much higher levels
- up to 6.8 ppm!
Cooking can greatly increase a food's fluoride content.
Peas, for example, contain 12 micrograms of fluoride when
raw and 1500 micrograms after they are cooked in
fluoridated water
It's interesting to note that in the 1950s, fluoridated
toothpastes were required to carry warnings on their labels
saying that they were not to be used in areas where water
was already fluoridated. Crest toothpaste went so far as
to write: "Caution: Children under 6 should not use Crest."
These regulations were dropped in 1958, although no new
research was available to prove that the overdose hazard
no longer existed.
How safe is all this fluoride? According to scientists
and informed doctors, such as Dr. John Lee, it is not
safe at all. Dr. Lee first took an anti-fluoridation
stance back in 1972, when as chairman of an environmental
health committee for a local medical society, he was asked
to state their position on the subject. He stated that
after investigating the references given by both pro- and
anti-fluoridationists, the group discovered three important
things: "One, the claims of benefit of fluoride, the 60%
reduction of cavities, was not established by any of these
studies. Two, we found that the investigations into the
toxic side effects of fluoride have not been done in any
way that was acceptable. And three, we discovered that
the estimate of the amount of fluoride in the food chain,
in the total daily fluoride intake, had been measured in
1943, and not since then. By adding the amount of fluoride
that we now have in the food chain, which comes from food
processing with fluoridated water, plus all the fluoridated
toothpaste that was not present in 1943, we found that the
daily intake of fluoride was far in excess of what was
considered optimal..."
Large numbers of people in Japan, China, India, the Middle
East, and Africa have been diagnosed with skeletal fluorosis
from drinking naturally fluoridated water. In India alone,
nearly a million people suffer from the afffliction.
According to a 1989 National Institute for Dental Research
study, 12% of children living in areas fluoridated at 1 ppm
develop dental fluorosis, that is, permanently stained,
brown mottled teeth. Up to 23% of children living in areas
naturally fluoridated at 4 ppm develop severe dental fluorosis.
The publication Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride, put out
by the National Academy of Sciences, reports that in areas
with optimally fluoridated water (1 ppm, either natural or
added), dental fluorosis [that is, permanently stained,
brown mottled teeth] affected 8 to 51% of the population.
Recently, a prevalence of slightly over 80% was reported in
children 12-14 years old in Augusta, Georgia.
The American Journal of Public Health says that
"...brittleness of moderately and severely mottled teeth
may be associated with elevated caries levels." In other
words, in these cases the fluoride is causing the exact
problem that it's supposed to prevent. Yiamouyiannis adds,
"In highly naturally-fluoridated areas, the teeth actually
crumble as a result. These are the first visible symptoms
of fluoride poisoning."
In May 1992, 260 people were poisoned, and one man died,
in Hooper Bay, Alaska, after drinking water contaminated
with 150 ppm of fluoride. The accident was attributed to
poor equipment and an unqualified operator. Was this a
fluke? Not at all. Over the years, the CDC has recorded
several incidents of excessive fluoride permeating the
water supply and sickening or killing people.
Japan has reduced the amount of fluoride in their drinking
water to one-eighth of what is recommended in the U.S.
Today, common fluoride levels in toothpaste are 1000 ppm.
Research chemist Woodfun Ligon notes that swallowing a
small amount adds substantially to fluoride intake.
Dentists say that children commonly ingest up to 0.5 mg
of fluoride a day from toothpaste. [Floyd: Equivalent to
drinking half a quart of fluoridated water]
The National Academy Of Sciences (NAS) stated in 1977 that,
for the average individual, a retention of 2mg fluoride/day
would result in crippling skeletal fluorosis after 40 years.
Children, the elderly and any person with impaired kidney
function (which includes many AIDS patients), are in the
high risk group for fluoride poisoning and must be warned
to monitor their fluoride intake. Also at high risk are
people with immunodeficiencies, diabetes and heart ailments,
as well as anyone with calcium, magnesium and Vitamin C
deficiencies.
Studies show that adults can absorb up to 0.5 mg per day
of fluoride from toothpaste.
Small children, even if a pea-size amount of toothpaste is
used, will absorb up to 0.5 mg of fluoride per day, more
if the child is younger and has less swallowing control
control. Bubblegum-flavored dentifrice obviously is very
inviting for children.
Due to the presence of fluoride, since April 1997 all
toothpaste sold in the US must carry a warning label,
advising parents what to do if their child swallows
more than the pea-size brushing amount.
Wholesale containers of fluoride-containing toothpaste
carry the poison symbol of skull and crossbones.
There are NO reliable studies, conducted under ethical
research guidelines, that prove the benefits of fluoride
supplementation. The FDA admits to this.
There are more than 500 peer-reviewed studies documenting
the adverse effects of fluoride, and NONE proving the
benefit of it.
Dentists make higher profits in fluoridated areas and
through fluoride use! As a result of mottled enamel, many
more restorative measures are necessary, such as braces,
bridges, etc. For the ADA/CDA, this condition is a real
money-maker, because cosmetic dentistry is far more
lucrative than cavity repair. In addition, there is an
abundance of evidence in the scientific literature
that fluoride causes a delay in the normal shedding of the
"baby" teeth, and their replacement by permanent teeth.
This delay has been shown to increase the number of
children with malpositioned teeth. Again, braces are far
more expensive than fillings.
The union representing all EPA scientists in Washington
has now filed a grievance demanding fluoride-free bottled
water for their offices.
A recent University of South Florida study found a relationship
between fluoride intake during pregnancy to the yearly 1%
increase in learning disabilities found in children.
Studies proving that fluorides transfer through the
placenta are well known. Yet Dr.Weil, Internet's Health
Guru, advocates fluoride supplements for pregnant woman
in his book "8 Weeks To Optimum Health".
There are also several studies linking aluminum with
fluoride, showing that the bioavailability of aluminum is
increased in the presence of fluorides, causing aluminum in
the brain to double in treated animals. According to an
October 28, 1992 Wall Street Journal Article about a study
conducted by Varnier JA, et al.: "Rats fed the highest doses
developed irregular mincing steps characteristic of senile
animals... Post mortem examination of the rat brains
disclosed 'substantial cell loss in structures associated
with dementia -- the neo-cortex and hippocampus'." Similar
data was published by Varner, Jansen and others in Brain
Research in 1998. (Note: Alzheimer's Disease, first
diagnosed by Dr. Alois Alzheimer in 1907, is now the #4
killer for every person over 60 in the US. Every 2nd person
over 70 will develop Alzheimer's.)
The US Public Health Service estimates that 1 in 5 children
have dental fluorosis.
All native reservations in the US have mandatory
fluoridation, resulting in very high incidents of
dental fluorosis in those areas.
Fluorosis affects up to 80% of people in some areas of
the US and up to 71% in Canada.
Studies have been conducted directly linking bone tissue
damage to children with dental fluorosis.
Fluorosis is the first visible sign that destructive
effects of fluoride are also occurring in bone,
connective tissue, immune and enzyme functions.
As a result of the original Manhattan Project logic,
industries, now mainly the fertilzer and aluminum
industries, have a perfect way to release their fluoride,
a hazardous and toxic waste. It would cost up to $US 8,000
per truckload to dispose of it otherwise. At a rate of
emissions into the air of 155,000 tons/year, in addition
to an estimated 500,000 tons of emissions into lakes, ocean,
rivers (not counting fluoridation) -- it's obvious that
industry is saving billions and billions of dollars.
Darlene Sherrell, not only discovered that the original
Roholm/Hodge fluoride safety figures had been mis-calculated
and then persisted with the help of Dr. Bob Carton and
Senator Bob Graham in her efforts to get the National
Research Council (NAS/NRC) to adopt the new figures --
which had even been corrected by Hodge himself in 1979 --
also managed to change the law in Michigan, giving people
the right to vote on fluoridation. Michigan was the first
state in the US to repeal their mandatory fluoridation law.
A 1944 editorial in the Journal of the American Dental
Association (JADA) states: "We do know that the use of
drinking water containing as little as 1.2 to 3ppm of
fluorine will cause such developmental disturbances
in bones as osteosclerosis, spondylosis and osteopetrosis,
as well as goitre".
Steyn writes in 1962 that drinking water containing as little
as 1 to 2 ppm of fluorine can cause serious disturbances of
general health and especially in normal thyroid gland
function and in the normal processes of calcium-phosphate
metabolism (parathyroid function).
In 1969 Siddiqui show small visible goiters in persons 14
to 17 years of age in India to be directly related to high
fluoride concentrations in drinking water.
Willems et al (1972) document that sodium fluoride blocks
thyroid hormone secretion.
Also in 1972 Day and Powell-Jackson studied 648 people in
13 mountaineous regions in Nepal where the iodine content
in the water was low and found a close relationship between
fluoride intake and the incidence of goiter.
In 1978 George Waldbott writes that in most cases of poisoning
from fluoridated water in which he had occasion to study the
action of the thyroid gland, it's function was low. He cites
a case of a 33-year-old male who exhibited typical manifesta-
tions of pre-skeletal fluorosis and a basal metabolism rate
of -22, indicative of hypothyroidism. Within three months
after the man ceased consuming fluoridated water, the
thyroid function had returned to normal (BMR=0). In addition,
Waldbott writes that "simultaneously, other symptoms
associated with low grade fluoride poisoning -- including
excessive thirst, headaches, blurred vision, arthritis in
shoulders, elbows, knees, and gastrointestinal disturbances
-- also disappeared."
We tried to settle this ethics issue quietly, within the
family, but EPA was unable or unwilling to resist external
political pressure, and we took the fight public with a
union amicus curiae brief in a lawsuit filed against EPA by
a public interest group. The union has published on this
initial involvement period in detail. Since then our
opposition to drinking water fluoridation has grown,
based on the scientific literature documenting the
increasingly out-of-control exposures to fluoride, the
lack of benefit to dental health from ingestion of
fluoride and the hazards to human health from such
ingestion. These hazards include acute toxic hazard,
such as to people with impaired kidney function, as well
as chronic toxic hazards of gene mutations, cancer,
reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, bone pathology and
dental fluorosis.
In 1995, Mullenix and co-workers showed that rats given
fluoride in drinking water at levels that give rise to
plasma fluoride concentrations in the range seen in humans
suffer neurotoxic effects that vary according to when the
rats were given the fluoride -- as adult animals, as young
animals, or through the placenta before birth. Those
exposed before birth were born hyperactive and remained so
throughout their lives. Those exposed as young or adult
animals displayed depressed activity...
Another 1998 publication by Varner, Jensen and others
reported on the brain- and kidney damaging effects in rats
that were given fluoride in drinking water at the same level
deemed "optimal" by pro-fluoridation groups, namely 1 part
per million (1ppm). Even more pronounced damage was seen in
animals that got the fluoride in conjunction with aluminum.
These results are especially disturbing because of the low
dose level of fluoride that shows the toxic effect in rats,
and rats are more resistant to fluoride than humans!
Two epidemiology studies from China show decreases in I.Q.
in children who get more fluoride than the control groups
of children in each study. These decreases are about 5 to
10 I.Q. points in children aged 8 to 13 years.
Fluoride interferes with the function of the brain's pineal
gland. The pineal gland produces melatonin which, among
other roles, mediates the body's internal clock.
"The EPA fired the Office of Drinking Water's chief
toxicologist, Dr. William Marcus, who also was our local
union's treasurer at the time, for refusing to remain
silent on the fluorine cancer risk issue.
Regarding the effectiveness of fluoride in reducing dental
cavities, there has not been any double-blind study of
fluoride's effectiveness as a caries preventative. There
have been many, many small scale, selective publications on
this issue that proponents cite to justify fluoridation,
but the largest and most comprehensive study, one done by
dentists trained by the National Institute of Dental
Research, on over 39,000 school children aged 5-17 years,
shows NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES (in terms of decayed,
missing and filled teeth) among caries incidences in
fluoridated, non-fluoridated and partially fluoridated
communities(16). The latest publication (17) on the 50
year fluoridation experiment in two New York cities,
Newburgh and Kingston, shows the same thing.
...In addition to our concern over the toxicity of
fluoride, we note the uncontrolled -- and apparently
uncontrollable -- exposures to fluoride that are occurring
nationwide via drinking water, processed foods, fluoride
pesticide residues and dental care products. A report in
The Wall Street Journal on Dec. 21, 1998 that, according
to the Centers for Disease Control, at least 22% of
America's children now have dental fluorosis, is just
one indication of this uncontrolled, excess exposure.
For governmental and other organizations to continue to
push for more exposure in the face of current levels of
over-exposure coupled with an increasing crescendo of
adverse toxicity findings is irrational and irresponsible
at best. Thus, we took the stand that a policy which makes
the public water supply a vehicle for disseminating this
toxic and prophylactically useless (via ingestion, at any
rate) substance is wrong.
We have also taken a direct step to protect the employees
we represent from the risks of drinking fluoridated water.
We applied EPA's risk control methodology, the Reference
Dose, to the recent neurotoxicity data. The Reference Dose
is the daily dose, expressed in milligrams of chemical per
kilogram of body weight, that a person can receive over the
long term with reasonable assurance of safety from adverse
effects. Application of this methodology to the Varner et
al. data leads to a Reference Dose for fluoride of
0.000007 mg/kg/day. Persons who drink about one quart of
fluoridated water from the public drinking water supply of
the District of Columbia while at work receive about 0.01
mg/kg/day from that source alone. This amount of fluoride
is more than 100 times (!) the Reference Dose. On the
basis of these results the union filed a grievance, asking
that EPA provide unfluoridated drinking water to its
employees. The implication for the general public of
these calculations is clear. Recent, peer-reviewed
toxicity data, when applied to EPA's standard method for
controlling risks from toxic chemicals, require an
immediate halt to the use of the nation's drinking water
reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the
phosphate fertilizer [and Aluminum] industry[s].
Thyroid activity is reduced while bathing in fluoridated
water, by absorption through the skin and inhalation.
The major iodine deficient areas in the country are
identical to endemic fluorosis areas.
One child dies every minute due to complications associated
with fluorine-induced iodine deficiency.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome can often be a result of hypothyrodism.
Conditions that increase tissue edema such as hypothyroidism
are well-known causes of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. In 1998,
Dr. Bob Carton wrote: "Based on Roholm's work and other recent
studies, there is every reason to believe that the increasing
number of people with carpal-tunnel syndrome and arthritis-
like pains are due to the mass fluoridation of drinking water"
Many psychoactive drugs including Prozac, Paxil and Luvox
are fluorinated medications. Rohypnol, the infamous date-
rape drug, is fluorinated Valium, which is about 20-30 times
more potent than Valium alone.
Fluoride in tea is much higher than the Maximium Contaminant
Level (MCL) set for fluoride in drinking water.
Tea leaves accumulate more fluoride (from pollution of soil
and air) than any other edible plant.
A website by a pro-fluoridation infant medical group lists
a cup of black tea to contain 7.8 mgs of fluoride -- roughly
the same amount as if one were to drink 7.5 quarts of water
in an area fluoridated at 1ppm.
Some British and African studies from the 1990's showed a
daily fluoride intake of between 5.8 mgs and 9 mgs a day
from tea alone [equal to drinking 5 to 9 quarts of
fluoridated water per day!].
Studies conducted on tea consumption in Tibetan children by
Cao et al. found both dental (51.2%) and skeletal (32.83%)
fluorosis, mainly as a result from drinking tea. More
studies by Cao and others reported similar results, as did
a study from Chile showing dental fluorosis risks in 22.1%
of the children consuming tea as a main beverage. Many
similar studies on tea as well as other beverages have been
published in the journals of the American Dental Association
(ADA) or American Medical Association (AMA) themselves.
Studies on hydrofluoric-acid workers from an electronics
company documented that, among the influences of fluorine-
containing foodstuff on fluoride content in the biological
fluids, the effect of black tea and/or green tea intake was
"particularly remarkable". Measuring the urine and serum
levels of fluorine ion, in the case of the non-hydrofluoric-
acid workers, the concentration increased to about double
of the control value. Similarly in a diet test on
volunteers, the concentration increased about six times.
In 1990 researchers at the University of Texas theorized
that "the rise in incidence of dental fluorosis in North
America is mainly due to the replacement of water intake
by caffeine-containing beverages among the young population".
To make matters much worse for human health, fluorides in
teas are found together with aluminum. The combination of
aluminum and fluorides in tea is of urgent concern, due to
the increased damage done by fluorides when in the presence
of aluminum, especially neurological and renal damage).
The fluoride/aluminum association is of particular importance
as it relates to Alzheimer's Disease. Aluminum by itself is
not readily absorbed by the body. However, in the presence
of fluoride ions, the fluoride ions combine with the aluminum
to form aluminum fluoride, which is absorbed by the body. In
the body, the aluminum eventually combines with oxygen to
form aluminum oxide or alumina. Alumina is the compund of
aluminum that is found in the brains of Alzheimer's disease
sufferers. In the brain, proteins bind to the alumina, and
"that is the key to the plaques and tangles which are the
hallmarks of this terrible disease".
In a study by Dr. Robert Isaacson at the State University
of New York, aluminum fluoride was added to the rats diet.
This, contrary to normal expectations, passed through the
brain barrier and gave the rats short term memory loss,
smell sensory loss, unsteady gait, and loss of structures
of the neo-cortex and hippocampus -- all symptoms of
Alzheimer's. A Varner and Jensen study conducted with
Isaacson confirmed this in 1998.
Toothpaste also contains a significant quantity of Aluminum
(Al), more so, when packed in Al tubes. That children often
ingest too much toothpaste is well established and the
reason why since April 1997 a poison warning is to be
placed on all fluoride-containing toothpastes in the US.
It is an absolute disgrace that this is not the same in
Canada, especially when the US FDA has issued several
Import Alerts and customs detention orders, documenting
fluoride amounts double that of permissable content
originating in Canada!
It is only in the last two decades during which endocrinology
has progressed so rapidly, that now over 150 symptoms and
associations can be identified in hypothyroidism. Almost
all (!) correlate with known symptoms of fluoride poisoning.
Most of the double-blind test results of fluoride poisoning
found in Moolenburgh's study on water containing 1ppm of
fluoride -- which led to the ban of fluoridation in Holland
-- are now recognized symptoms of hypothyroidism.
The effects of fluoride on the thyroid gland have been
studied so extensively, that it baffles the mind how experts
on thyroid disease from Harvard or the University of Toronto
can claim that fluorides do not affect thyroid gland function,
especially when it has been used as medication to do just that!
This stance just defies all knowledge properly gained in the
last 70 years of related research. One cannot find any
mention of fluorides in ANY current "official" thyroid
disease related literature.
A toxicologist in the United Kingdom recently found that
perinatal deaths in a fluoridated area was 15% higher than
in neighboring non-fluoridated areas. The fluoridated area
had a higher socio-economic status and would have been
expected to have less perinatal deaths. The fluoridated
area also had a 30% higher rate of Down's Syndrome.
Chile banned fluoridation because of research by the world-
reknowned researcher and Nobel price winner, Dr. Albert
Schatz, which showed a link to infant deaths due to
fluoridation.
Learning disorders such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD) did not knowingly exist before the fluoridation
of public water supplies began. In the 1950's ADHD spread
rapidly among school children and gained much exposure in
the medical science and health literature. In 1963 the U.S.
PHS listed dozens of symptoms associated with hyperactivity
and officially changed the name to "minimal brain dysfunction".
By the the 1970's some leading authorities noted that this
disorder appeared to lie at the root of nearly every type of
childhood behaviour problem, and had become the most commonly
diagnosed illness among childhood counsellors. In 1987 the
American Medical Association acknowledged that brain damage
had become the leading disability reported by elementary
schools, and "one of the most common referral problems to
psychiatry outpatients clinics". Many studies on thyroid
hormones have shown that attention deficit and/or hyper-
activity disorders in children are linked to changes in the
levels of thyroid hormone in the blood, and that irritability
and aggressive behaviour are linked to thyroid hormone
levels and hypothyroidism.
It is important to note that mother's milk passes on neglible
amounts of fluoride in very high fluoride-intake areas, as if
Nature meant to protect the infant.
Could it be that the world-wide "iodine deficiency" (IDD)
is actually fluoride excess? By comparing IDD data supplied
by the WHO with fluorosis data found on MEDLINE, an answer
may be found. Judge for yourself:
COUNTRY IDD GOITER/FLUOROSIS
India Very High Very High
Nigeria High High
Belgium Moderately Low Moderately Low
France Low Low
China Very High Very High
Mexico Very High Very High
Brazil High High
Italy High High
Tanzania Very High Very High
Sudan High High
"Iodine deficiency" is now recognized as the most common
cause of preventable brain damage and mental disability in
the world today.
If you drink 1 cup (6oz) of green/black tea a day, with
fluoride content of 5mg, you can expect Chronic Skeletal
Fluorosis to appear as follows (based on a 100 lb person):
As argued by Dean Burk and the attorneys who established
the connection between cancer deaths and fluoridation,
there is a premise in logic which states that the most
obvious cause of an event must be taken as face value
while one searches for alternative possibilities. Because
it can be documented that fluorides were given as medication
for hyperthyroid patients it should be considered the
OBVIOUS cause for hypothyroidism and other thyroid-hormone
function-related disorders, including ADHD, arthritis,
osteoporosis, etc., especially at intake levels as high
as they are.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has previously
estimated that levels of fluoride in/on food from the
agricultural use of Cryolite plus fluoride levels in U.S.
drinking water supplies results in a daily dietary
intake of fluoride of approximately 0.095 mg/kg/day. For
a person weighing 155 pounds, this would mean intake of
6.65mg/day from those two sources alone!. [That rate of
consumption of fluoride will induce crippling fluorsis
in 23 years].
A group of biologists and medical researchers at the
University of Wisconsin in Madison, led by Warren P. Porter,
recently completed a 5-year experiment putting mixtures of
low levels of pesticide chemicals into the drinking water
of male mice and carefully measuring the results. They
reported that combinations of these chemicals -- at levels
similar to those found in the groundwater of agricultural
areas of the U.S. -- have measurable detrimental effects
on the nervous, immune and endocrine (hormone) systems.
They say their research has direct implications for humans.
Porter explains, "To get a chemical into a cell you've got
to have part of the chemical that's fat soluble so it can
pass through the cell membrane. And part of it has to have
a strong electrical charge because you need to attract the
chemical to the part of the cell where you want to do the
damage. The trouble is, the ways cells communicate, both
within themselves and between each other, is by means of
highly charged molecules, ions really. These things are
being pumped across the membranes and moved around in cells.
So when you take a chemical that you've designed that has a
strong electrical charge and you put it in the middle of
this tremendous stream of communication--I mean, a high
school chemistry student could tell you there are going to
be effects. There's just no way these things are not going
to be biologically active. It's very important for people
to understand that. This is a very real concern."
[Any chemist will tell you that Fluoride is the most
reactive element known to man]
Recently a study of 4 and 5 year-old children exposed to
pesticides in Mexico specifically noted a decrease in
mental ability and an increase in aggressive behavior
among children, indicating thyroid dysfunction. The
exposed children demonstrated decreases in stamina, gross
and fine eye-hand coordination, 30-minute memory, and the
ability to draw a person.
The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology
has classified fluoride as an unapproved dental medicament
due to its high toxicity.
The FDA considers fluoride an unapproved new (NEW!!!) drug
for which there is no proof of safety or effectiveness.
Fluoride is an acute toxin with a rating [4 - very toxic]
higher than that of lead [3 to 4, moderately to very toxic],
according to "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial products,"
5th Edition, 1984
The EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for lead is 0.015 ppm,
with a goal of 0.0ppm yet the MCL for fluoride is currently
set for 4.0ppm - a ridiculous level that is over 250 times
more lenient than the permissable level for lead, yet Fluoride
is officially rated as more toxic!
Fluoride is one of the most bone seeking elements known.
The US Public Health Service has stated that fluoride makes
the bones more brittle and the dental enamel more porous.
Children's ingestion of fluoride from juices and juice-
flavored beverages can be quite substantial and a crucial
factor in developing fluorosis.
Grape juice has been found to contain up to 6.8 mg/L of
fluoride -- half a quart per day will cause crippling
skeletal fluorosis ("arthritis") in 40 years.
Fluoride can be found in water, toothpaste, mouthwash,
Dentist's treatment, fluoride pills, juice, soft drinks,
canned food, commercial fruit and vegetables, Teflon and
Tefal coated items (such as frying pans), etc.
No "optimal" fluoride intake has ever been scientifically
documented.
As little as 0.04 mg fluoride, per kg, per day has been
proven to cause adverse health effects. For a 150 pound
person, this works out to about 2.7mg per day -- the
amount in one quart of milk or half a quart of grape
juice!
On July 9, 1998 the Manchester Guardian reported news of
fluoride poisoned water in Central India, from untested
wells drilled in the 1980s, causing severe arthritic damage
to tens of millions of people.
The US Public Health Service has stated that fluoride
makes the bones more brittle and dental enamel more porous.
Studies have proved that fluoride toxicity affects fertility.
Fluorides lower the intelligence capacity of humans, with
children, again, especially susceptible to early fluoride
toxicity. IQ levels were significantly lower than children
not exposed to fluorides in all age groups listed.
[Li,X.S.,Zhi,J.L.,Gao,R.O.,"Effects of Fluoride Exposure
on the Intelligence of Children", Fluoride, 1995]
Studies proving the neurotoxicity of fluoride in rats have
been conducted by Dr. Phyllis Mullinex. In 1995 Mullenix
and co-workers showed that rats given fluoride in drinking
water at levels that give rise to plasma levels fluoride
concentrations in humans, suffer neurotoxic effects that
vary according to when the rats were given the fluoiride
-- as adult animals, as young animals, or thorugh the
placenta before birth. Those exposed before birth were
born hyperactive and remained so throughout their lives.
Those exposed as young animals displayed depressed activity.
Four major studies involving 480,000 children (US, 39,000;
Japan, 22,000; India, 400,000; Tucson, 29,000) comparing
fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas showed no significant
difference in decay rates. What is proven is that a higher
intake of fluoride will actually cause MORE cavities,
especially for children with low dietary calcium intake.
Fluoride causes cancer. In 1981, Dean Burk, for many
decades Chief Chemist at the US National Cancer Institute,
testified at congressional hearings, reporting that at least
40,000 cancer deaths in 1981 were attributable to fluoride.
40,000 cases that could have been prevented simply by NOT
putting industry waste into the public water supply.
Burk stated that fluoride causes more cancer, and causes
it faster, than any other chemical.
In 1996 yet another cancer related study was published
showing significant positive correlation between fluoride
concentration in drinking water and uterine cancer
mortality.
Fluorides can transform normal cells into cancerous ones,
as has been shown in countless studies since Tsutui first
published his data in 1984.
In 1997 there were more than 80 references available
linking fluoride to cancer.
The FDA does not consider fluoride an essential nutrient.
Many pesticides contain fluorine as an "inactive"
ingredient -- serving as the adjuvant ("ferry") that
delivers the agent to its target. Because they are
considered "inert", listing is not required on labels.
[As a Chemical Engineer, I can tell you that Fluorine
is the EXACT OPPOSITE of inert. Inert means unreactive,
and Fluorine is the most reactive element known to man.
HF, Hydrogen Fluoride, can etch glass!]
Q. I heard fluoride is a poison. Is this true?
Q. Does fluoride accumulate in the body?
Q. How does fluoride get into the water?
Q. How can my dentist say that Fluoride's good for my teeth?
Q. Is it true that fluoride can cause cancer?
Q. Is it true that fluoride can increase hip fractures?
Q. Does fluoridation increase Osteoporosis and Arthritis?
Q. Does fluoride cause brain damage?
Q. How wide-spread is the problem of fluorosis?
Q. What do I need to do? How can I protect myself?
Q. What do I need to do? How can I protect myself?
Q. What about the fluoride treatment at the dental office?
Q. If all the harmful effects of fluoride are true, how can
all this be sanctioned by the government?
E-mail: floyd@just-think-it.com
4 Fluoride facts, horror stories and cover-ups from
Fluoridation.com
http://www.fluoridation.com/news.htm#Toronto Star
From Fluoridation.com
- Dr. William Marcus, Ph.D, EPA Scientist,
Food & Water Journal, Summer 1998
From Fluoridation.com
- Journal of the American Medical Association,
Sept 18, 1943, Editorial
From Fluoridation.com
- Dr. P. Mullenix, Ph.D.
From Fluoridation.com
5 Fluoride facts, horror stories and cover-ups from
NoFluoride.com
From NoFluoride.com
From NoFluoride.com
http://www.nofluoride.com/chemifloc.htm
From NoFluoride.com
http://www.nofluoride.com/nsf.htm
From NoFluoride.com
http://www.nofluoride.com/auburndale_fla_water.htm
From NoFluoride.com
36 Fluoride facts, horror stories and cover-ups from
http://Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
- the opinion of a federal scientist who preferred
to remain anonymous, released on February 22, 1990
in the Medical Tribune, an international medical
news weekly received by 125,000 doctors.
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
From Rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm
102 Fluoride facts, horror stories and cover-ups from
http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union Of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
- EPA Scientists, 1998
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
- Green Tea & Fluoride
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
Phase 1: within 5 years
(sporadic pain; stiffness in joints; osteosclerosis
of pelvis and vertebral column)
Phase 2: after 10 years
(chronic joint pain; arthritic symptoms; slight
calcification of ligaments; increased osteoclerosis/
cancerous bones; with/without osteoporosis of long bones)
Phase 3 (crippling fluorosis) after 23 years
(limitation of joint movement; calcification of ligaments/
neck, vert. Column; crippling deformities/spine major
joints; muscle wasting;neurological defects/compression
of spinal chord).
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
The fluoride in half a tube of toothpaste can kill a child.
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
From Bruha.com
A. Yes. Fluoride is an acute toxin with a rating [4 - very
toxic] higher than that of lead [3 to 4, moderately to
very toxic].
From Bruha.com
A. Yes. About half of each day's fluoride intake will be
retained. This is what makes it so dangerous. "The
dose makes the poison". All sides agree to the fact
that healthy kidneys can eliminate only about 50% of
daily fluoride intake. The rest gets absorbed in
calcified tissues, like bones and teeth. The National
Academy Of Sciences (NAS) stated in 1977 that, for the
average individual, a retention of 2mg/day would result
in crippling skeletal fluorosis after 40 years.
From Bruha.com
A. Most often as a byproduct from the fertilizer, aluminum
and other industries, who manage to sell this toxic
waste to municipalities nationwide for human consumption.
Incredible, but a fact.
From Bruha.com
A. By receiving limited training on the subject and being
misinformed on purpose by the ADA and CDA. Figures in
ADA pamphlets contain an incredible amount of untruths,
and outright fraudulent claims. If you check the
references cited and numbers listed in your local
libraries, you will come to the same conclusion. Most
dentists never bother to take the time to study both
sides of the fluoride issue. Consider this statement
by the ADA in 1979: "Individual dentists must be
convinced that they need not be familiar with scientific
reports and field investigations on fluoridation to be
effective participants and that non-participation is
overt neglect of personal responsibility." There are
NO reliable studies, conducted under ethical research
guidelines, which prove the benefits of fluoride
supplementation. The FDA admits to this! And there
are more than 500 peer-reviewed studies documenting
the adverse effects of it!
From Bruha.com
A. Yes. In 1981, Dean Burk, for many decades Chief Chemist
at the US National Cancer Institute, testified at
congressional hearings, reporting that at least 40,000
cancer deaths in 1981 were attributable to fluoride.
40,000 cases that could have been prevented simply by
NOT putting industry waste into the public water supply.
Burk stated that fluoride causes more cancer, and causes
it faster, than any other chemical.
From Bruha.com
A. Yes. According to Dr. J. William Hirzy (vice-president
of the NFFE LOCAL 2050, the union representing all
scientists at the EPA, Washington, D.C.) there have
been 5 epidemiological studies done since 1990, in
three different countries, all showing increased hip
fractures in fluoridated communities. Some studies
have indicated a 87% higher risk of hip fractures to
the elderly.
From Bruha.com
A. Yes, most definitely. Scientists at EPA in Washington
have declared that there is every reason to believe that
the increasing numbers of people with carpal-tunnel
syndrome and arthritis-like pains are due to the mass
fluoridation of drinking water. On July 9, 1998 the
Manchester Guardian reported news of fluoride poisoned
water in Central India, from untested wells drilled in
the 1980s, causing severe arthritic damage to tens of
millions of people -- a national disaster.
From Bruha.com
A. Yes. Fluorides lower the intelligence capacity of humans,
with children, again, especially susceptible to early
fluoride toxicity. IQ levels were significantly lower
than children not exposed to fluorides in all age groups
listed. (Li,X.S.,Zhi,J.L.,Gao,R.O.,"Effects of Fluoride
Exposure on the Intelligence of Children", Fluoride, 1995)
From Bruha.com
A. The US Public Health Service estimates that 1 in 5
children have dental fluorosis. All native reservations
in the US have mandatory fluoridation, resulting in very
high incidents of dental fluorosis in those areas.
Realistic figures are as high as 80% in some areas in
the US and up to 71% in Canada. Studies have been
conducted directly linking bone tissue damage to
children with dental fluorosis. Fluorosis is the first
visible sign that destructive effects of fluoride are
also occurring in bone, connective tissue, immune and
enzyme functions.
From Bruha.com
A. If you live in an area with fluoridated water, drink
distilled water. You can have it delivered or buy it
at supermarkets. You can also buy distilling or reverse
osmosis systems for home use which is the only way for
taking fluoride out of the water. Also, eliminate any
Teflon of Tefal coated cook ware, for scratches in the
surface will release PTFE, another toxic fluoride
compound. Avoid fruit juices coming from fluoridated
areas. All non-organic grape products are especially
high in fluoride content due to the number of fertilizer
and pesticide applications. Wine can contain up to
3 ppm fluoride. Avoid using any toothpaste or mouth
wash containing fluoride. There are many alternatives
on the market.
From Bruha.com
A. Lobbying is required to demand fluoride content labeling
on commercial products. Steps to educate the public
about this proven health risk and fluoride's toxic
properties must be taken immediately and health
advisories issued. Water fluoridation should cease
immediately and steps should be taken to reduce
fluoride in food, drink and dental products. If you
live in a fluoridated area, take action to stop the
addition of fluoride into the water supply.
Individuals ARE successful in educating legislators
about the issue and have helped pass laws to stop the
addition of fluoride into the water supply.
From Bruha.com
A. Fluoride treatments can contain between 10,000 to 20,000
ppm! Astonishingly, there is no regulated dose requirement.
There are cases known of children dying in the dentist's
chair. (New York Times, Jan.20, 1979: "$750,000 Given in
Child's Death in Fluoride Case" about a three year old
child killed by fluoride treatment in the Dentist's office.)
From Bruha.com
A. In 1939 a dentist named H. Trendley Dean, DDS, examined
water from 345 communities in Texas. Dr. Dean worked
for the U.S Public Health Service (PHS). He determined
that high concentrations of fluoride in the water
corresponded to a high incidence in mottled teeth.
To many dentists this provided an answer to the problem
of mottled teeth they saw in some of their patients.
Dr. Dean also unexpectedly found a lower incidence of
dental cavities in communities having about 1 ppm
fluoride in the water supply. Among the native residents
of these areas about ten percent developed the very
mildest forms of mottled enamel, usually described as
"beautiful white teeth". However, Dean used a technique
known as "selective use of data", using data from 21
cities while completely disregarding data from 272
other locations which show an almost complete lack of
correlation when plotted. (J. Colquhoun, International
Symposium on Fluoridation, Porte Alegre, Brazil,
September 1988). Meanwhile, a number of court cases were
being launched due to fluoride contamination, mainly by
the aluminum industry. In addition the Manhattan Project,
the secret atomic bomb project, was in a big race to build
the world's first A-bomb. A pollution incident of great
magnitude occurred at a factory in New Jersey (DuPont)
producing millions of tons of fluoride for the project.
A major "negative PR" problem was emerging, threatening
the Manhattan Project and the secrecy around it. In 1945,
supposedly as a result of Dr. Dean's discovery, the PHS
planned to conduct a 10-year study of fluoridation in
two cities. Grand Rapids, Michigan was chosen as the city
for artificial fluoridation and Muskegon, Michigan was the
non-fluoridated city for comparison and cavity rates were
to be compared. In 1950, after only five years into the
project, due again to pressure exerted from the atomic
bomb program, public health officials started to campaign
for fluoridation -- hand in hand with industry looking
for a solution to threatening law suits, and an American
Dental Association desperate for "respect" and recognition.
The campaign was based on the fact that fluoridated Grand
Rapids had shown some decrease in cavity rate. Meanwhile
there was also a decrease in cavity rate shown in non-
fluoridated Muskegon. However, Muskegon was dropped
from the study for unknown reasons. After the project
was completed, only the Grand Rapids result was released
and a major PR campaign promoting fluoride use started.
From Bruha.com